Antonia’s Flowers Antonia’s Flowers
Friday, November 4th, 2005Antonia’s Flowers eau de parfum is, in a word, maddening. It is both repugnant and beautiful.
The eau de parfum opens with a note I can only liken to the smell of a bad hangover. The first ten minutes are utterly dominated by a particularly bilious pollen that chokes. It is honestly so bad that each time I tested this I was consumed with a deep desire to scrub it off and forget about having the patience to see it through to the drydown.
But with time, I begin to perceive a tiger lily-like smell, still rife with pollen, but fortunately evaporated of all bile. While it’s not quite so alienating, I still feel an urge to scrub. This fades down into a nice enough Easter lily scent, which quickly drops off into… nothing. It’s as if the scent has died completely.
But then ever so s-l-o-w-l-y, and utterly surprisingly, freesia begins to rise. It is an effulgent yet delicate freesia note, and I’d have to say it comes the closest I’ve ever smelled in perfume to capturing the flower itself. The scent of pressed linens and but the slightest implication of pepper is what marks this note as so flower-true to me. The freesia seems underpinned by the freshness of calla lilies at the very end, and gives me the sensation of floating along in a cloud of my own sillage.
I can’t say I’d ever buy a full bottle of Antonia’s Flowers: I find the opening far too unsettling. Even gross. And the unevenness of development is not something I’m keen on at all. But I think Antonia’s Flowers should be given serious consideration by those who really love freesia (and do not mind strong lily.) It is available in an eau de parfum, which I tested, as well as an eau de toilette and parfum.
Top image of the doggie hangover from www.bornintoit.com. Much more beautiful second image is entitled “Freesia and Lilies,” by Lynn Gertenbach, and is from the Ella Walton Richardson Fine Art Gallery.