<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carolina Herrera ~ Chic and 212 Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scentzilla.com/2006/07/07/carolina-herrera-chic-and-212-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scentzilla.com/2006/07/07/carolina-herrera-chic-and-212-men/</link>
	<description>A monster perfume habit. On a rampage... with a wanton waft of sillage in its wake.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cool Things Spotted! - Perfumey</title>
		<link>http://scentzilla.com/2006/07/07/carolina-herrera-chic-and-212-men/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool Things Spotted! - Perfumey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scentzilla.com/?p=185#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>[...] Carolina Herrera [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carolina Herrera [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scentzilla!</title>
		<link>http://scentzilla.com/2006/07/07/carolina-herrera-chic-and-212-men/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Scentzilla!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scentzilla.com/?p=185#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>Aw, what a nice brother you are. But I think you're going to have to gift yourself with a bottle of it shortly, or you'll be having to steal sprays from his bottle ;) I've yet to try the Chic for Men, actually, but I'll have to get on that before my time runs out too - it seems to be much better thought of than the women's version? I dig the 212 Men I think because it's just a little subtle in a way for men's frags, you know? The musky element seems fuzzier than it's usually played out in a ton of men's fragrances. Even the incensey bit seems subtle in a way. I think there's a soft almost invisible vanillic dab in the base to keep it softened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, what a nice brother you are. But I think you&#8217;re going to have to gift yourself with a bottle of it shortly, or you&#8217;ll be having to steal sprays from his bottle ;) I&#8217;ve yet to try the Chic for Men, actually, but I&#8217;ll have to get on that before my time runs out too - it seems to be much better thought of than the women&#8217;s version? I dig the 212 Men I think because it&#8217;s just a little subtle in a way for men&#8217;s frags, you know? The musky element seems fuzzier than it&#8217;s usually played out in a ton of men&#8217;s fragrances. Even the incensey bit seems subtle in a way. I think there&#8217;s a soft almost invisible vanillic dab in the base to keep it softened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shifts</title>
		<link>http://scentzilla.com/2006/07/07/carolina-herrera-chic-and-212-men/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>shifts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 14:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scentzilla.com/?p=185#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>That's funny and kind of sad. Funny because I just bought Chic for Men for my younger brother yesterday on his birthday and very sad because I really like it. I do own 212 Men and prefer Chic over that one. The plan has been to buy a bottle of Chic when 212 runs out, but time seems short now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny and kind of sad. Funny because I just bought Chic for Men for my younger brother yesterday on his birthday and very sad because I really like it. I do own 212 Men and prefer Chic over that one. The plan has been to buy a bottle of Chic when 212 runs out, but time seems short now :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
